Qualia represent the subjective, qualitative aspects of conscious experience—the deeply personal, ineffable nature of how things feel from the inside. They are the raw, immediate sensations that constitute our inner life: the redness of red, the painfulness of pain, the unique shade of an emotional experience that cannot be fully communicated or reduced to objective description.
Consider the simplest sensory experiences: the warmth of sunlight on your skin, the taste of a ripe strawberry, the distinct sound of a violin. These are not merely physical stimuli processed by our sensory organs, but rich, immediate experiences that have a specific, subjective quality that seems to exist beyond mere neurological processes.
Philosophers of mind have long grappled with the problem of qualia. How do physical processes in the brain give rise to these intense, personal experiences? The philosopher Thomas Nagel captured this enigma brilliantly in his famous essay “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?”—arguing that there’s something fundamentally unique about subjective experience that cannot be fully explained by objective, third-person scientific descriptions.
The challenge of qualia is particularly relevant in our discussions of artificial intelligence. Large language models, for all their computational brilliance, entirely lack this subjective experience. They can process information about colors, emotions, and sensations with incredible sophistication, but they do not experience the inner, qualitative dimension of these concepts. There is no “inner feel” to their processing—no subjective experience of redness, no personal sensation of pain or joy.
This is why artificial intelligence, despite its remarkable capabilities, remains fundamentally different from human consciousness. Qualia represent the most intimate, unreducible aspect of our experience—the very essence of what it means to be a conscious, feeling being.
Philosophers have proposed various approaches to understanding qualia. Some argue they are emergent properties of complex neural systems. Others suggest they represent a fundamental aspect of reality that cannot be explained by physical processes alone. The “hard problem of consciousness,” as philosopher David Chalmers termed it, remains one of the most profound mysteries in our understanding of mind and experience.
In our interactions with artificial intelligence, we are constantly confronted with this fundamental distinction. These systems can simulate, analyze, and respond with incredible sophistication, but they do not experience. They process without feeling, compute without sensing, communicate without the rich, ineffable inner life that defines human consciousness.
Qualia remind us of the profound mystery at the heart of conscious experience—a mystery that technology, for all its advancement, has yet to penetrate. They are the most personal, the most intimate aspect of our existence—a reminder that there are depths to consciousness that remain beyond our current
The AI’s do not experience time or it’s passing. Therefore they do not experience Qualia the same way humans do.